On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:36 PM, SiNA Rabbani sina@redteam.io wrote:
Are we also interested in translating this to other languages? Perhaps we can get the Farsi done ASAP, since we now have a country obfsproxy users coming to this page soon :)
Yes, I pointed george (asn) in the direction of my TorCheck repo (https://github.com/aagbsn/TorCheck) which outlines the sort of templating and i18 work that should make supporting BridgeDB's front end easier.
--Aaron
All the best, SiNA
Andrew Lewman:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:08:36 +0530 Sathyanarayanan Gunasekaran gsathya@torproject.org wrote:
In general, these look great. Some nitpicking items:
Here are the .htmls - https://people.torproject.org/~gsathya/html/index.html
- The majority of users aren't going to know which obfsproxy browser
they're using. I understand the difference, but to make a decision, we should only ship one obfsTBB and assume everyone is using it as a target for this site. I'm guessing we just call the obfsproxy-flashproxy-tbb as obfsTBB and move forward with it.
The correct email address is bridges@bridges.torproject.org
I think we should scrap "normal bridges" and only promoted obfuscated
bridges. In the bigger picture, "normal bridges" are already subject to DPI attack and blocked in many places in the world based on Tor's network signature alone. All bridges should be obfsproxy bridges.
-- “Be the change you want to see in the world.” Gandhi _______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev