17 Jan
2016
17 Jan
'16
12:21 a.m.
On Jan 16, 2016, at 4:52 AM, George Kadianakis desnacked@riseup.net wrote:
Yes, I think I agree with this evaluation for now. Seems prop246 is more complicated than we can handle, and we should probably postpone it, except if someone can analyze it well soon.
I agree. There are too many open questions with proposal 246 to plan on implementing it in the same timeframe as we’re working on proposal 224.
I suggest we change the proposal status to ‘Needs-Research’, and plan to gather all of these comments and make a real analysis of the tradeoffs at some later point.
- special