Sathyanarayanan Gunasekaran:
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:26 PM, George Kadianakis <desnacked@riseup.net> wrote:
I started writing a skeleton and some strings for the new website. I'm also attaching an image of how the website looked like in my head while I was writing the strings (although the person who codes, should choose the interface). Sathya (cc'ed) said that he would be interested in coding the web part.
Here are the .htmls - https://people.torproject.org/~gsathya/html/index.html https://people.torproject.org/~gsathya/html/captcha.html https://people.torproject.org/~gsathya/html/bridges.html
Some links are sub-optimal in these mockups. Having link on "here", "these" or "this" is not really helpful. See <http://www.w3.org/QA/Tips/noClickHere> and <http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/www/click.html> for more details. I think it would be better to have these links phrased as: * I want [obfs2 bridges] for tor-obfsproxy-browser. * I want [obfs2 bridges] or [obfs3 bridges] for tor-flashproxy-pyobfsproxy. * I want [direct bridges] for other bundles like tor-browser. * This website allows you to get [bridge addresses]. * Please read the [introduction to obfuscated bridges and pluggable transports]. The square brackets delimit the linked part. I've replaced "direct bridges" because I think "direct" is probably a better wording than "normal". The norm might shift to obfsproxy bridges in the next months… What do you think? -- Jérémy Bobbio .''`. lunar@debian.org : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `-