On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 06:01:13PM +0000, George Kadianakis wrote:
Karsten Loesing karsten@torproject.org writes:
The question is, what graphs do we want on Metrics? How about:
- Total hidden-service traffic in Mbit/s (per day, using weighted
interquartile mean, like lower graph on page 1 of the PDF)
- Unique .onion addresses (per day, using weighted interquartile
mean, like upper graph on page 1 of the PDF)
- Fraction of relays reporting hidden-service statistics (containing
both dir-onions-seen and rend-relayed-cells, like page 3 of the PDF)
I think these are indeed the essential graphs here. Let's proceed with these for now!
Sounds great. I'm really excited to see these graphs up on the metrics page.
That said, for the "total hidden-service traffic" one... we want to know that, but we also want to know what fraction that is of total traffic, yes? I could imagine a graph with total hidden-service traffic and also with total traffic; but then the smaller curve will be around y=0 and not easy to see. What would you all think about a graph that is estimated fraction of total traffic that is hidden-service traffic, instead of graph #1 above?
Note that I left out "fraction of traffic", because we can't guarantee that our many assumptions we made for the blog post will hold in the future. Happy to be convinced otherwise.
Oh. Yes, this is exactly the same question. Hm. I think the "number of hidden-service related bytes" is going to go up over time, and make it really easy for people to mis-conclude "hidden-service related bytes are getting to be more of Tor's traffic" which is not what that means.
Which assumptions from the blog post do you think are going to become less right in the future? Because I'd much rather have the graph that tells us the answer to the research question.
I think a new tab on metrics called "Advanced" with such research graphs would be helpful. Maybe.
We could also imagine a cron job somewhere that generates the graphs somewhere (e.g. people.tp.o), and an "advanced" link from the hs metrics page to those graphs. To make it clearer that it's informal and not something we'll necessarily include forever.
--Roger