1 Nov
2012
1 Nov
'12
8:04 p.m.
"Nick Mathewson" <nickm@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
I'm happy to open another ticket for these, but have you tried using the bugtracker yourself? Is there some UI issue or something that prevents you from opening tickets?
I used the easy way-out; sent an email. It didn't occured at the time, there was a bugtracker. Will use that next time,.
* Second, the workaround is error-prone. If the fields in the structure are ever designated in an order that doesn't match their declaration order in the structure definition, we'll get a situation where C99-compliant compilers generate the code as intended, but where non-C99-compliant compilers fail, or worse-- generate different code.
I'm aware of that. That's probably why that C99 feature was added. --gv