2 Nov
2013
2 Nov
'13
4:13 p.m.
Hi David,
adding .i2p support to torsocks is perfectly fine. It's a feature, not a limitation. Who doesn't want to use it won't be annoyed by it. (Other than man page and --help entry, but well, life is tough. :)
Someone else already said on this list some time ago "since torsocks is agnostic about a Tor or a random socks server, there is no point in calling it torsocks". If it works fine with normal socks servers and you are willing to support that, sure, why not rename it.
I am very happy that you are taking the lead fixing torsocks so I think you also should also be the one who may make such decisions.
Cheers, adrelanos