On 30.03.2014 12:44, Karsten Loesing wrote:
Hi Christian,
moving our private discussion to the public mailing list.
You were asking about making graphs from Onionoo's new clients documents. Here's an example:
"1_week":{"first":"2014-03-23 12:00:00","last":"2014-03-30 12:00:00","interval":86400,"factor":0.002802803,"count":8,"values":[251,933,471,955,999,999,735,713],"countries":{"cn":0.1882,"dz":0.0728,"es":0.0146,"fr":0.1006,"gb":0.0174,"hk":0.0233,"ir":0.1119,"jp":0.1882,"kz":0.0117,"my":0.1532,"us":0.1123},"versions":{"v4":1.0000}},
For this bridge, you'd draw the first data point at x = 2014-03-23 12:00:00 UTC with y = 251 * 0.002802803 = 0,703503553 concurrent users.
Thanks, I added client graphs to canary/index-11349.html .
You were also asking about feedback on new uptime graphs:
http://rndm.de/globe/canary/index-11349.html
Looks pretty good! The uptime graphs for the relays I checked were not as exciting as the bandwidth graphs, but it's actually good if uptime is always at 100%.
And finally, you asked about showing numeric averages next to graphs, like on:
https://status.github.com/graphs/past_week
I like the idea. I think we shouldn't split up graphs to have only 1 line per graph, because that makes it hard to compare incoming and outgoing traffic or the various weights to each other. But it could help to have numeric averages in the same color as graph lines next to the graphs.
Do you think, that we should place all graphs above eachother? With more than two graphs it's harder to compare them if they're positioned in a grid like fashion.
Thanks!
All the best, Karsten