On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 18:01:42 -0400 Nick Mathewson <nickm@freehaven.net> wrote:
If you want to work on this it would be helpful to maybe start by listing (here or elsewhere) some places where you *don't* feel like you could (or would want to) write documentation: those would be a good target for devs who _have_ worked on Chutney before.
Sounds good, I will work on this.
Though I think this is likely to be an ongoing change that we see over time, since
Was this sentence supposed to be longer?
* More tests for the various parts of chutney, and refactoring to make them more testable.
Internal unit testing seems like a good idea, yes.
* Making chutney comply with one or more of the python style checking tools that are out there.
I can look into this; personally I have no experience with Python style-checking or linting tools, but now's a good time as ever for me to learn what is available and how it would work for Chutney.
This is an good vision for how Chutney should go; I really support this idea.
Glad you are on board :) Caitlin