On 10 Jul 2015, at 11:35 , teor teor2345@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 Jul 2015, at 09:47 , Cory Pruce corypruce@gmail.com wrote:
Signed PGP part
Well, you could test my latest branches for #14175:
Hey Tim, I got the branch of chutney and tor and made sure that the commands you run in the comments of the issue exist. What do you think would be a good way to start testing? Begin with a static analysis of the code?
If you can read Python and shell script, then checking I haven't made any obvious coding errors in my changes would help. But that might require becoming familiar with the codebase - which may take some effort.
The diffs are here, or you can use git diff: https://github.com/teor2345/chutney/compare/feature14175-chutney-performance... https://github.com/teor2345/tor/compare/feature14175-chutney-performance-v2
This commit contains all the tor changes: https://github.com/teor2345/tor/commit/128d4a68967fb2986965e9f8443f362a9dc20...
(The github comparison picked the wrong base branch, so it's huge and unhelpful.)
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp ABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5
teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7