20 Aug
2012
20 Aug
'12
9:06 a.m.
On 8/9/12 8:29 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
On 8/8/12 8:13 PM, Mike Perry wrote:
Since HotPETS doesn't count as "publishing" perhaps this should be listed as a tech report: http://fscked.org/talks/TorFlow-HotPETS-final.pdf
[...]
How about we put the LaTeX sources in tech-reports.git, change them to use the new tech report template, assign a report number, and add a footnote saying "This report was presented at 2nd Hot Topics in Privacy Enhancing Technologies (HotPETs 2009), Seattle, WA, USA, August 2009."? Then people can decide if they rather want to cite our tech report or the HotPETs one.
Happy to do or help with the conversion if you tell me where your sources are.
So, what do you think? Still happy to help. :)
Thanks, Karsten