Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable transport weekly meeting

Ximin Luo:

I assume people will be interested in creating Debian packages for these too. I am wondering if we should adopt a naming convention like tor-pt-sshproxy, tor-pt-flashproxy, tor-pt-obfsproxy etc - like how mozilla extensions are all called xul-ext-*. (We could even start a working group too.)

ATM this would involve renaming obfsproxy, but I am about to package flashproxy, and thinking about what to name the package.

I have heard people making the argument that obfsproxy, at least, was not specific to Tor and could perfectly be used with plain SSH. The prefix “tor-pt-” would not really be appropriate then.