NOTICE: The following directory authorities are not reporting bandwidth scanner results: longclaw NOTICE: Authorities disagree about the BadExit flag for CBAC7E90BDB8A0F726E35FADDB23B20FA0637A89 (with flag: moria1, gabelmoo, without flag: longclaw, faravahar) NOTICE: Authorities disagree about the BadExit flag for 9139500BF0AA42B7435E1F83B5A7C2A43B74621D (with flag: moria1, gabelmoo, without flag: longclaw, faravahar) NOTICE: Authorities disagree about the BadExit flag for AC7D936936597140FC65C85DA8A7DB2336CB27FA (with flag: moria1, gabelmoo, without flag: longclaw, faravahar) NOTICE: Authorities disagree about the BadExit flag for 8380581CAC9C5C2F76C5485F5E3F76271F904853 (with flag: moria1, gabelmoo, without flag: longclaw, faravahar) NOTICE: Authorities disagree about the BadExit flag for 8E0FA1184B7F158271F46FFDA131E4C0FB28E468 (with flag: moria1, gabelmoo, without flag: longclaw, faravahar)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hello. Why were these five given the BadExit flag? These are relays that I was setting up for someone else while we were troubleshooting BadExit issues that they were having. The relays ran successfully for over two weeks but, immediately after handing them off and changing the ContactInfo, they are being given this flag. This is not the first time this has happened, either. Can any directory authority operator shed light on this, please? Regards, forest -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQQtr8ZXhq/o01Qf/pow+TRLM+X4xgUCaWwirAAKCRAw+TRLM+X4 xk/dAP97kTbRjTbtdyiXz7B8VD49t1UG6KkegYBgD9pv4gsbsQD/V2UF78+Ud3nx EXPvm5Re1MCLpHKXDHXounhuFVjeRgs= =1RLV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (2)
-
forest-relay-contact＠cryptolab.net -
gk＠torproject.org