NOTICE: The following directory authorities were not expected to report bandwidth scanner results: longclaw
atagar@torproject.org:
NOTICE: The following directory authorities were not expected to report bandwidth scanner results: longclaw
longclaw started to use data from sbws [0]. How can we tell this consensus health tool that this is not an issue?. Thanks! juga. [0] ticket to monitor dirauths using sbws: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/28224#comment:2
longclaw started to use data from sbws [0]. How can we tell this consensus health tool that this is not an issue?.
tell doctor about it: https://gitweb.torproject.org/doctor.git/tree/consensus_health_checker.py#n3... -- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
Oops, thanks. Done: https://gitweb.torproject.org/doctor.git/commit/?id=f85feca On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 2:16 PM nusenu <nusenu-lists@riseup.net> wrote:
longclaw started to use data from sbws [0]. How can we tell this consensus health tool that this is not an issue?.
tell doctor about it: https://gitweb.torproject.org/doctor.git/tree/consensus_health_checker.py#n3...
-- https://twitter.com/nusenu_ https://mastodon.social/@nusenu
_______________________________________________ tor-consensus-health mailing list tor-consensus-health@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-consensus-health
participants (4)
-
atagar＠torproject.org -
Damian Johnson
-
juga -
nusenu