Since longclaw is running different BWAuth code do we only want to compare it with others using the shiny new thing? Or should it be similar to the others?
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 1:07 PM atagar@torproject.org wrote:
ERROR: Unable to retrieve the consensus from dizum (http://194.109.206.212:80/tor/status-vote/current/consensus): <urlopen error timed out> ERROR: Unable to retrieve the vote from dizum (http://194.109.206.212:80/tor/status-vote/current/authority): <urlopen error timed out> NOTICE: The following directory authorities recommend other client versions than the consensus: gabelmoo -0.3.5.4-alpha NOTICE: The following directory authorities recommend other server versions than the consensus: gabelmoo -0.3.5.4-alpha NOTICE: Consensus fetched from maatuska was missing the following authority signatures: dizum NOTICE: Consensus fetched from longclaw was missing the following authority signatures: dizum NOTICE: Consensus fetched from bastet was missing the following authority signatures: dizum NOTICE: Consensus fetched from gabelmoo was missing the following authority signatures: dizum NOTICE: Consensus fetched from moria1 was missing the following authority signatures: dizum NOTICE: Consensus fetched from dannenberg was missing the following authority signatures: dizum NOTICE: Consensus fetched from Faravahar was missing the following authority signatures: dizum WARNING: The following authorities are missing from the consensus: dizum NOTICE: Bandwidth authorities have a substantially different number of measured entries: maatuska (7158), longclaw (5412), bastet (7152), gabelmoo (6972), moria1 (7162), Faravahar (7034)_______________________________________________ tor-consensus-health mailing list tor-consensus-health@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-consensus-health