commit fb7692a685682e7d688abdfeaa87e805b07beec9 Author: Karsten Loesing <karsten.loesing@gmx.net> Date: Thu Jan 16 13:13:18 2014 +0100 Fix link in Q&A section of users.html. --- web/WEB-INF/users.jsp | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/web/WEB-INF/users.jsp b/web/WEB-INF/users.jsp index 45ecdee..ec9f200 100644 --- a/web/WEB-INF/users.jsp +++ b/web/WEB-INF/users.jsp @@ -337,8 +337,9 @@ graph. Q: Why are no numbers available before September 2011?<br/> A: We do have descriptor archives from before that time, but those descriptors didn't contain all the data we use to estimate user numbers. -We do have older user numbers from an earlier estimation approach here -(add link), but we believe the current approach is more accurate. +We do have older user numbers from an earlier estimation approach +<a href="/data/old-user-number-estimates.tar.gz">here</a>, but we believe +the current approach is more accurate. </p> <p> @@ -355,8 +356,7 @@ Q: And what about the advantage of the current approach over the old one when it comes to bridge users?<br/> A: Oh, that's a whole different story. We wrote a 13 page long <a href="https://research.torproject.org/techreports/counting-daily-bridge-users-2012-10-24.pdf">technical -report</a> explaining the reasons for retiring the old approach. But the -old data is still <a href="/data/old-user-number-estimates.tar.gz">available</a>. +report</a> explaining the reasons for retiring the old approach. tl;dr: in the old approach we measured the wrong thing, and now we measure the right thing. </p>