[research-web/master] add an in-progress tor research safety board page
commit 2a8bad5f20954bc53e1ae0dd9075ff372a922852 Author: Roger Dingledine <arma@torproject.org> Date: Fri Apr 22 01:05:46 2016 -0400 add an in-progress tor research safety board page --- htdocs/safetyboard.html | 251 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 251 insertions(+) diff --git a/htdocs/safetyboard.html b/htdocs/safetyboard.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..12c8dec --- /dev/null +++ b/htdocs/safetyboard.html @@ -0,0 +1,251 @@ +<html> +<head> +<title>Tor Research Safety Board</title> +<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"> +<link href="css/stylesheet-ltr.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet"> +<link href="/images/favicon.ico" type="image/x-icon" rel="shortcut icon"> +</head> +<body> + +<table class="banner" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" summary=""> +<tr> + <td class="banner-left"> + <a href="index.html"> + <img src="/images/top-left.png" alt="Click to go to home page" + width="193" height="79"></a></td> + <td class="banner-middle"> + <a href="index.html">Home</a> + Safety Board + <a href="groups.html">Groups</a> + <a href="ideas.html">Ideas</a> + <a href="techreports.html">Tech Reports</a> + </td> + <td class="banner-right"></td> +</tr> +</table> + +<div class="center"> +<div class="main-column"> +<h2>Tor Research Safety Board</h2> +<br> + +<p><center><i>This page is under construction. Don't believe everything on it yet!</i></center> + +<ul> +<li><a href="#what">What is the Tor Research Safety Board?</a></li> +<li><a href="#guidelines">What are the safety guidelines?</a></li> +<li><a href="#how">How can I submit a request for advice?</a></li> +<li><a href="#examples">What are some example papers that are in-scope?</a></li> +<li><a href="#who">Who is on the Board?</a></li> +<li><a href="#faq">FAQ</a></li> +</ul> + +<hr> +<a id="what"></a> +<h3><a class="anchor" href="#what">What is the Tor Research Safety +Board?</a></h3> +<br> + +<p> +We are a group of researchers who study Tor, and who want to <b>minimize +privacy risks while fostering a better understanding of the Tor network +and its users</b>. We aim to accomplish this goal in three ways: + +<ol> +<li>developing and maintaining a set of guidelines that researchers can +use to assess the safety of their Tor research.</li> +<li>giving feedback to researchers who use our guidelines to assess the +safety of their planned research.</li> +<li>teaching program committees about our guidelines, and encouraging +reviewers to consider research safety when reviewing Tor papers.</li> +</ol> + +<hr> +<a id="guidelines"></a> +<h3><a class="anchor" href="#guidelines">What are the safety +guidelines?</a></h3> +<br> + +<p> +Here's a start: + +<ol> +<li>Use a test Tor network whenever possible. +<li>Only attack yourself / your own traffic. +<li>Only collect data that is safe to make public. +<li>Don't collect data you don't need (minimization). +<li>Limit the granularity of data (e.g. use bins or add noise). +<li>The benefits should outweigh the risks. +<li>Consider auxiliary data (e.g. third-party data sets) when assessing +the risks. +<li>Consider whether the user meant for that data to be private. +</ol> + +<p> +There's plenty of room for further improvement here. In fact, we think +this list itself is a really interesting research area. Please help! + +<hr> +<a id="how"></a> +<h3><a class="anchor" href="#how">How can I submit a request for advice?</a></h3> +<br> + +<p> +The vision is that you (the researchers) think through the safety +of your plan, write up an assessment based on our guidelines, and send +it to us. Then we look it over and advise you about how to make your +plan safer, how to make your arguments crisper, or what parts really +seem too dangerous to do. Later (e.g. when your paper gets published) we'll +encourage you to make your assessment public. Over time we'll grow a +library of success cases, which will provide best practices guidance +for being safe, and also provide templates for writing good assessments. + +<p> +We hope that going through this process will help you think clearly +about the benefits and risks of your experiment. Hopefully our feedback +on your thoughts will help too. At the same time, this process will help +Tor by letting us know what research is happening — which in turn +can help you, since we might be able to let you know about a concurrent +experiment that will mess up your results. + +<p> +To best help you, we want to hear about four aspects of your proposed +experiment or research plan: +<ol> +<li>What are you trying to learn, and why is that useful for the +world? That is, what are the hoped-for benefits of your experiment? +<li>What exactly is your plan? That is, what are the steps of your +experiment, what will you collect, how will you keep it safe, and +so on. +<li>What attacks or risks might be introduced or assisted because of your +actions or your data sets, and how well do you resolve each of them? Use +the "safety guidelines" above to help in the brainstorming and analysis. +<li>Walk us through why the benefits from item 1 outweigh the remaining +risks from item 3: why is this plan worthwhile despite the remaining +risks? +</ol> + +<p>We encourage you to include your assessment as a section of your +research paper — one of the goals here is that reviewers on +program committees come to expect a section in Tor papers that explains +what mechanisms the researchers used for ensuring privacy risks +were handled, and argues that the balance between new understanding +and risk is worthwhile. For space reasons, you might include a streamlined +version in the main body of the paper and a more detailed version in +an appendix. + +<p> +In the future, we'd like to come up with a more thorough template for +self-assessments, to help you make sure you don't miss any critical +areas. Please let us know what would help you most. + +<p>Contact address coming soon. In the meantime, mailing Roger is not +a terrible plan. + +<hr> +<a id="examples"></a> +<h3><a class="anchor" href="#examples">What are some example papers that are in-scope?</a></h3> +<br> + +<p> +This is where the templates and example self-assessments will go. + +<hr> +<a id="who"></a> +<h3><a class="anchor" href="#who">Who is on the Board?</a></h3> +<br> + +<p> +The current people who have expressed interest in the board are: +<ul> +<li><a bunch of swell people from the PETS reviewing community, +whose names I shouldn't add here until they've at least read this draft +page></li> +</ul> + +<hr> +<a id="faq"></a> +<h3><a class="anchor" href="#faq">FAQ</a></h3> +<br> + +<p><b>Why now?</b> +The importance of Tor is growing in the world, and interest from +researchers remains high as ever. Each week we run across a new paper +that maybe didn't think things through in terms of keeping their users +safe. We've seen lately that simply having a sensitive data set, even +if you plan to never give it out, can put users at real risk. +At the same time, we've seen exciting papers like PrivEx, which show +that studying how to do research safely can be a research field in itself. +Now is the perfect time for us to work to shape future research +so we build habits of safety in our community, and so we help people to +understand what is possible. + +<p><b>What about bad people who don't care about being safe?</b> +A safety board cannot by itself stop all dangerous Tor research. Plenty +of people out there don't play the academic game, and some people don't +care about user safety at all. Our goal here is to support the people +who want to cooperate, while showing to the world that it's possible to +do good Tor research safely. + +<p><b>Can't I just run Tor relays and do my experiment without telling you?</b> +Please don't! The directory authorities have been much more conservative +lately (after the CMU incident in particular) in terms of looking for +suspicious patterns or behavior, and removing suspicious relays from the +network. If the directory authority operators know about you, understand +your research, and can read about why the benefits are worth the risks +in your case, they will likely leave your relays in place, rather than +surprising you by kicking your relays out of the network mid experiment. + +<p><b>Can I do this assessment and review process even if I'm not writing +an academic paper?</b> +Please do! Our goal as stated above is "to minimize privacy risks while +fostering a better understanding of the Tor network and its users". If +your end goal is something other than a research paper, that's great too. + +<p><b>Is this an ethics board?</b> +We framed this idea as a safety board, not an ethics board. We think +safety is a narrower scope: we aim to describe <i>how</i> to be safe, +and we aim to make it the norm that reviewers and program committees +expect to see an analysis of why an experiment/measurement is safe. We +also are not adding new bottlenecks to the research process, such as +mandating that we have to vet the analysis first — that's ultimately +between the researchers and the program committees. We aren't trying to +replace IRBs or other projects like ethicalresearch.org. + +<p><b>What about confidentiality?</b> +We will keep assessments that we receive confidential in the same +way that program committees do. You're coming to us much earlier in +the process (ideally before the research is performed and before the +paper is written), which we recognize requires more trust. We hope we +add enough value to your research that you find this tradeoff worthwhile. + +<p><b>So you want conferences to adopt your guidelines?</b> +Not quite. We would be sad if program chairs told their reviewers "Make +sure the paper follows Tor's guidelines for safe research." We would +instead like the chairs to tell the reviewers "Make sure the paper has +performed safe research. If you're unsure what that means, I encourage +you to read Tor's guidelines to get ideas on what to consider." That is, +we want the reviewers to always be thinking through, for each paper, +whether this is a safe or unsafe situation. Reviewers should enforce +the ethical requirements of the conference they're reviewing for — +or their own ethical principles, if the conference neglected to have an +opinion on the topic. Our goal here is to help them think through what +to look for. + +<p><b>Is Tor going to do this assessment process for its design +decisions and statistics collection?</b> +Absolutely! You'll notice a big improvement over the years +between <a href="https://trac.torproject.org/13988">our +early statistics collection choices</a> and <a +href="https://blog.torproject.org/blog/some-statistics-about-onions">our +later ones</a>. That learning process is part of what led to this +safety board. We'd like to revisit many of Tor's design choices, +especially once we've worked through some other examples here. We'd +love to have your help there. + +</div> +</div> + +</body> +</html> +
participants (1)
-
arma＠torproject.org