Author: atagar Date: 2013-03-19 17:15:17 +0000 (Tue, 19 Mar 2013) New Revision: 26121

Modified: website/trunk/getinvolved/en/volunteer.wml Log: Adding application prereqs for Tor project ideas

Spoke with Nick and got both confirmation that they're still relevant and prereqs for applying. Hopefully this'll ensure a decent quality for applications and warn away students for whom it's a bad idea.

Modified: website/trunk/getinvolved/en/volunteer.wml =================================================================== --- website/trunk/getinvolved/en/volunteer.wml 2013-03-19 14:45:18 UTC (rev 26120) +++ website/trunk/getinvolved/en/volunteer.wml 2013-03-19 17:15:17 UTC (rev 26121) @@ -914,7 +914,13 @@ href="https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/blob_plain/HEAD:/proposals/203-htt... 203</a> has a general design sketch. </p> + + <p> + <b>This project is likely trickier than it looks. You should avoid applying + for this if you're uncertain about being able to complete it.</b> + </p> </li> + </li>

<a id="chutneyExpansion"></a> <li> @@ -937,6 +943,12 @@ built to the point where we could use Chutney to exercise various Tor features as an automated integration test. </p> + + <p> + <b>As part of your application for this project please submit a patch that + expands Chutney.</b> + </p> + </li>

<a id="limitCapabilities"></a> @@ -1129,6 +1141,13 @@ operations, directory service -- and refactor its interface completely, to minify and codify its points of contact with the rest of Tor. </p> + + <p> + <b>As part of your application for this project please identify one of the + thorniest Tor functions and submit a patch refactoring it to be better. If + you find this to be difficult then this likely isn't the project for + you.</b> + </p> </li>

<li>