Author: phobos Date: 2012-11-26 21:03:28 +0000 (Mon, 26 Nov 2012) New Revision: 25911

Modified: website/trunk/eff/en/tor-dmca-response.wml Log: fix the link to RIAA vs. Verizon pdf on eff's site. Thanks to Christian for the notice.

Modified: website/trunk/eff/en/tor-dmca-response.wml =================================================================== --- website/trunk/eff/en/tor-dmca-response.wml 2012-11-26 16:33:17 UTC (rev 25910) +++ website/trunk/eff/en/tor-dmca-response.wml 2012-11-26 21:03:28 UTC (rev 25911) @@ -63,8 +63,8 @@ conduit. Instead, the "conduit" safe harbor of section 512(a) of the DMCA has different and less burdensome eligibility requirements, as the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals held in RIAA v. Verizon (see <a -href="https://www.eff.org/legal/cases/RIAA_v_Verizon/opinion-20031219.pdf" -title="https://www.eff.org/legal/cases/RIAA_v_Verizon/opinion-20031219.pdf%22%3Ehtt...</a>) +href="https://www.eff.org/sites/default/files/filenode/RIAA_v_Verizon/20030121-ria... +https://www.eff.org/sites/default/files/filenode/RIAA_v_Verizon/20030121-ria...</a>) and the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed in RIAA v. Charter (see <a href="https://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/Charter/033802P.pdf" title="https://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/Charter/033802P.pdf">https://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/Charter/033802P.pdf</a>).</p>