commit d1ac5613fc832f4b298fbc243a35660dbd0976e3 Author: teor teor@torproject.org Date: Mon Nov 5 15:27:38 2018 +1000
Entry Nodes: Use a reasonably live consensus to select guards
Fixes bug 24661; bugfix on 0.3.0.1-alpha. --- changes/bug24661 | 3 +++ src/feature/client/entrynodes.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/changes/bug24661 b/changes/bug24661 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a915a93e0 --- /dev/null +++ b/changes/bug24661 @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@ + o Minor bugfixes (client, guard selection): + - When Tor's consensus has expired, but is still reasonably live, use it + to select guards. Fixes bug 24661; bugfix on 0.3.0.1-alpha. diff --git a/src/feature/client/entrynodes.c b/src/feature/client/entrynodes.c index 20208ef61..e0fe1b9a5 100644 --- a/src/feature/client/entrynodes.c +++ b/src/feature/client/entrynodes.c @@ -287,7 +287,9 @@ create_initial_guard_context(void) guard_selection_type_t type = GS_TYPE_INFER; const char *name = choose_guard_selection( get_options(), - networkstatus_get_live_consensus(approx_time()), + networkstatus_get_reasonably_live_consensus( + approx_time(), + usable_consensus_flavor()), NULL, &type); tor_assert(name); // "name" can only be NULL if we had an old name. @@ -726,7 +728,9 @@ update_guard_selection_choice(const or_options_t *options) guard_selection_type_t type = GS_TYPE_INFER; const char *new_name = choose_guard_selection( options, - networkstatus_get_live_consensus(approx_time()), + networkstatus_get_reasonably_live_consensus( + approx_time(), + usable_consensus_flavor()), curr_guard_context, &type); tor_assert(new_name); @@ -1125,14 +1129,16 @@ select_and_add_guard_item_for_sample(guard_selection_t *gs, * or if we don't need a consensus because we're using bridges.) */ static int -live_consensus_is_missing(const guard_selection_t *gs) +reasonably_live_consensus_is_missing(const guard_selection_t *gs) { tor_assert(gs); if (gs->type == GS_TYPE_BRIDGE) { /* We don't update bridges from the consensus; they aren't there. */ return 0; } - return networkstatus_get_live_consensus(approx_time()) == NULL; + return networkstatus_get_reasonably_live_consensus( + approx_time(), + usable_consensus_flavor()) == NULL; }
/** @@ -1147,9 +1153,9 @@ entry_guards_expand_sample(guard_selection_t *gs) tor_assert(gs); const or_options_t *options = get_options();
- if (live_consensus_is_missing(gs)) { + if (reasonably_live_consensus_is_missing(gs)) { log_info(LD_GUARD, "Not expanding the sample guard set; we have " - "no live consensus."); + "no reasonably live consensus."); return NULL; }
@@ -1395,11 +1401,12 @@ sampled_guards_update_from_consensus(guard_selection_t *gs) { tor_assert(gs);
- // It's important to use only a live consensus here; we don't want to - // make changes based on anything expired or old. - if (live_consensus_is_missing(gs)) { + // It's important to use a reasonably live consensus here; we want clients + // to bootstrap even if their clock is skewed by more than 2-3 hours. + // But we don't want to make changes based on anything that's really old. + if (reasonably_live_consensus_is_missing(gs)) { log_info(LD_GUARD, "Not updating the sample guard set; we have " - "no live consensus."); + "no reasonably live consensus."); return; } log_info(LD_GUARD, "Updating sampled guard status based on received "