commit 13e8c8c231d51483d4fcd835ac6f833804c73025 Author: teor teor@torproject.org Date: Tue Feb 4 23:15:45 2020 +1000
Prop 312: Define an IPv6 sybil block
As suggested by Nick Mathewson and s7r.
Part of 33073. --- proposals/312-relay-auto-ipv6-addr.txt | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/proposals/312-relay-auto-ipv6-addr.txt b/proposals/312-relay-auto-ipv6-addr.txt index e434267..7724afd 100644 --- a/proposals/312-relay-auto-ipv6-addr.txt +++ b/proposals/312-relay-auto-ipv6-addr.txt @@ -972,6 +972,7 @@ Ticket: #33073 * IPv4 /8 and IPv6 /16 for port summaries, * IPv4 /16 and IPv6 /32 for path selection (avoiding relays in the same network block). + See also the next section, which uses IPv6 /64 for sybils.
3.5.6. Add IPv6 Support to AuthDirMaxServersPerAddr
@@ -982,8 +983,36 @@ Ticket: #33073 and returns a list of IPv4 or IPv6 sybils.
Use the modified get_possible_sybil_list() to exclude relays from the - authority's vote, if there are more than AuthDirMaxServersPerAddr on the - same IPv4 or IPv6 address. + authority's vote, if there are more than: + * AuthDirMaxServersPerAddr on the same IPv4 address, or + * AuthDirMaxServersPerIPv6Site in the same IPv6 /64. + + We choose IPv6 /64 as the IPv6 site size, because: + * provider site allocations range between /48 and /64 + (with a recommendation of /56), + * /64 is the typical host allocation + (see [RFC 6177: IPv6 End Site Address Assignment]), + * we don't want to discourage IPv6 address adoption on the tor network. + + Tor currently uses: + * IPv4 /8 and IPv6 /16 for port summaries, + * IPv4 /16 and IPv6 /32 for path selection (avoiding relays in the same + network block). + See also the previous section, which uses IPv6 /48 for the local network. + + This change allows: + * up to AuthDirMaxServersPerIPv6Site relays on the smallest IPv6 site + (/64, which is also the typical IPv6 host), and + * thousands of relays on the recommended IPv6 site size of /56. + The number of relays in an IPv6 block was previously unlimited, and sybils + were only limited by the scarcity of IPv4 addresses. + + We propose choosing a default value for AuthDirMaxServersPerIPv6Site by + analysing the current IPv6 addresses on the tor network. Reasonable + default values are likely in the range 4 to 50. + + If tor every allows IPv6-only relays, we should review the default value + of AuthDirMaxServersPerIPv6Site.
Since these relay exclusions happen at voting time, they do not require a new consensus method.