commit e06b912e9d95a7ebf7663ecd150ba5262a3f6f18 Author: Roger Dingledine arma@torproject.org Date: Wed Sep 29 05:21:39 2021 -0400
simple grammar issues in prop321 --- proposals/321-happy-families.md | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/proposals/321-happy-families.md b/proposals/321-happy-families.md index 288ba66..f9ac7b4 100644 --- a/proposals/321-happy-families.md +++ b/proposals/321-happy-families.md @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ we can de-duplicate families which sometimes helps.) Adding or removing a server from the family requires all the other servers to change their torrc settings.
-The is growth in size is not just a theoretical problem. Family +This growth in size is not just a theoretical problem. Family declarations currently make up a little over 55% of the microdescriptors in the directory--around 24% after compression. The largest family has around 270 members. With Walking Onions, 270 @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ requirements and providing a more detailed migration plan. In this design, every family has a master ed25519 "family key". A node is in the family iff its server descriptor includes a certificate of its ed25519 identity key with the family key. The certificate -format the one in the tor-certs.txt spec; we would allocate a new +format is the one in the tor-certs.txt spec; we would allocate a new certificate type for this usage. These certificates would need to include the signing key in the appropriate extension.
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ need to do in this event would be to move to a new private family key.
A more orthodox method would be to keep the private key somewhere -offline, and using it to generate a certificate for each relay in +offline, and use it to generate a certificate for each relay in the family as needed. These certificates should be made with long-enough lifetimes, and relays should warn when they are going to expire soon. @@ -186,8 +186,8 @@ microdescriptors' family lines: digest of the microdescriptor listed in the original votes. (This calculation is deterministic.)
-The problem with this approach is that authorities would have to s -to fetch microdescriptors they do not have in order to replace their +The problem with this approach is that authorities would have to +fetch microdescriptors they do not have in order to replace their family lines. Currently, voting never requires an authority to fetch a microdescriptor from another authority. If we implement vote compression and diffs as in the Walking Onions proposal,