[Tor www-team] Moving things forward!
Max Jakob Maass
max at velcommuta.de
Mon Jan 20 11:48:19 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Perhaps this discussion can be-picked up*, and a git repo can be
> initiated :)
> +1 from me.
> Thoughts on going about this? Initial questions:
> * In the case of evaluating static publishing tools, would it be a
> case of creating a repo for each then having folk hack on those?
> * Where would these initial repos be created? GitHub? Elsewhere?
> Does it even matter?
Perhaps staying on the Projects infrastructure would be best, as the
integration with the trac would probably help (as opposed to opening
another bugtracker on GitHub).
Although github does have the advantage of providing pull requests and
similar things... In which case we would need n >= 1 active
maintainers who check and manage pull requests, while people can work
on their own forks.
I know of some people who have problems with things being hosted on
GitHub, and I don't know what the stance inside the Tor Project is on
that. Andrew / Lunar, what would your opinion be?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the www-team