[Tor www-team] First set of technical requirements
Eric Schaefer
omg at eric-schaefer.com
Wed Jan 8 20:10:28 UTC 2014
> I think this a nice idea on paper however in terms of an MVP (Minimal Viable Product) I think it would make sense, in my opinion, to aim for one release with graceful degradation.
+1 on this. Let’s do this right, and let the pages degrade gracefully w/o javascript.
On Jan 8, 2014, at 9:04 PM, Rey Dhuny <rey at spcshp.com> wrote:
>> Maybe we could create 2 projects. One online with complete js and others things. The other project could be the simple version for user without js and other things
>>
> I think this a nice idea on paper however in terms of an MVP (Minimal Viable Product) I think it would make sense, in my opinion, to aim for one release with graceful degradation.
>
> We could then focus our efforts efficiently then after release we can look at different _release flavours_, so to speak.
>
> Just my 2p :)
>
> Rey
>
> --
> reyhan.org
>
> On 8 Jan 2014, at 19:51, ramiro tinoco <rowend at rowend.com> wrote:
>
>> Maybe we could create 2 projects. One online with complete js and others things. The other project could be the simple version for user without js and other things
>>
>> El ene 8, 2014 10:00 a.m., "Silviu Riley" <silviu.riley at gmail.com> escribió:
>> I agree. Local files are much more secure than a local web server. Less attack profile for the computer starting TBB from USB for example.
>>
>> Also less chance that something will fail (eg server fails to start).
>>
>> Silviu.
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2014 10:12 AM, "Rey Dhuny" <rey at spcshp.com> wrote:
>> Sean Rafferty:
>>
>> > Just to clarify: technically tools like Jekyll or Sinatra could be used because the server can be started wherever the site files are located whether it’s a USB stick or a laptop, correct?
>>
>> I am of the opinion that starting a local server on a USB stick adds a level of complexity compared to distributing a bunch of flat files that Jekyll/Middleman generate.
>>
>> Rey
>>
>> --
>> reyhan.org
>>
>> On Wednesday, 8 January 2014 at 15:09, Sean Rafferty wrote:
>>
>>> Just to clarify: technically tools like Jekyll or Sinatra could be used because the server can be started wherever the site files are located whether it’s a USB stick or a laptop, correct?
>>>
>>> On Jan 8, 2014, at 9:34 AM, Lunar <lunar at torproject.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sean Rafferty:
>>>>> Pardon my ignorance, but is the requirement for a static site a
>>>>> security concern or simply an ease-of-use issue?
>>>>
>>>> Security concerns, ease to setup, ease of mirroring.
>>>>
>>>>> Another dumb question, but when you say the site needs to work
>>>>> offline, do you mean people can view the content without a web
>>>>> server, or that it must run on a local instance of a web sever and not
>>>>> require things like google's cdn version of query?
>>>>
>>>> Tor is used for censorship circumvention. Think about an USB stick with
>>>> the Tor Browser Bundle, and a copy of the website. The website should be
>>>> usable without requiring any access to the network so people can learn
>>>> how to use Tor to reach the wider Internet.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lunar <lunar at torproject.org>
>>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>>> Tor Website Team coordination mailing-list
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe or change other options, please visit:
>>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-team
>>>
>>> ________________________________________________________________________
>>> Tor Website Team coordination mailing-list
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe or change other options, please visit:
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-team
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>> Tor Website Team coordination mailing-list
>>
>> To unsubscribe or change other options, please visit:
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-team
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>> Tor Website Team coordination mailing-list
>>
>> To unsubscribe or change other options, please visit:
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-team
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________________
>> Tor Website Team coordination mailing-list
>>
>> To unsubscribe or change other options, please visit:
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-team
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Tor Website Team coordination mailing-list
>
> To unsubscribe or change other options, please visit:
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/www-team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/www-team/attachments/20140108/c66e6948/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/www-team/attachments/20140108/c66e6948/attachment.sig>
More information about the www-team
mailing list