[ux] Feedback on my usability evaluation of tor launcher wiki page

[Carolin Zöbelein]

Hi Linda,

at irc I promised you to have a look at
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorLauncherUX2016#Use
rpainpoints

Hence, here my comments:

1. In section: "Resulting Improvements" 
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorLauncherUX2016#Res
ultingImprovements

=> The order of text/content and tables is confusing. After reading the
first paragraph ("We used these industry standard metrics ..."), I'm
expecting the content of table 2 and not one. Perhaps you should write
the content(order) of the whole section a bit differently.

2. A general remark, not especially about this content
=> When I was a student, I participated at a lot of "scientific
laboratory research" as test person. I don't know the conditions within
this research was done, but in general the most times if I read
research papers I missed more information about this conditions and
about the "test persons". My personal experience is: "official" the
offer to be a test person was given for all kind of persons but in
reality the test group was very homogeneous of a special group of
people.
E.g. I participated for tests at the economic sciences department of my
university. Official, to be a test person was open for everybody, but
in reality, 99% of the participants where freshman economic science
students. I would say, that's not the average of the population ;)

I only wanted to use the chance to remark my personal experience here.
I has nothing especially to do with your work :).

This test person time was a strange time. Clicking three hours all the
time on the same button can be very funny. ;) 

Bye,
Carolin

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Carolin Zöbelein / Nick: Samdney
PGP: D4A7 35E8 D47F 801F 2CF6 2BA7 927A FD3C DE47 E13B
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Am Freitag, den 10.02.2017, 07:55 -0600 schrieb Linda Naeun Lee:
> Hi all,
> 
> I would like some feedback on my writing. I've gotten my paper
> accepted 
> into PETS under the condition that I add a section explaining my
> design 
> considerations[1], which the shepherd thinks it's arguably the most 
> valuable part of my paper. Since it doesn't exist before yesterday,
> I 
> would like feedback on 1) if this is helpful 2) if it is accurate and
> 3) 
> if I should add anything.
> 
> If you have time, I would love for you to read the whole wiki
> page[2] 
> and give me feedback on the outline! I've ordered things in the wiki 
> differently than my paper, but I think this makes more sense. But let
> me 
> know if it doesn't!
> 
> ヽ(•◡•)ﾉ,
> Linda
> 
> P.S.: Yes, it's long-ish, but it's much, much shorter than my 21-
> page 
> conference-style paper. ;)
> 
> [1] 
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorLauncherUX2016#D
> esignconsiderations
> [2] https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorLauncherUX20
> 16