[tor-talk] Measuring on-line anonymity
me at lunorian.is
Wed Aug 15 13:34:26 UTC 2018
Someone recommended that email was a more "anonymous" protocol. That really
depends. Most email servers, by default, forward the client IP Address in
headers. Make sure you are using Tor Browser with webmail or TorBirdy in
Thunderbird if you want to use email "anonymously". Going to add at best
email is a pseudonymous protocol. At some point there is an identity,
ideally it's not linkable to you in real life but... Gmail for example
almost always requires you register from a residential IP Address and
verify a phone number - I won't even call Gmail pseudonymous, it's directly
linkable to you. The prepaid burner phone argument is silly - anyone
On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:28 PM, Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> wrote:
> On 08/14/2018 04:48 PM, panoramix.druida wrote:
> > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > El 14 de agosto de 2018 8:17 PM, Mirimir <mirimir at riseup.net> escribió:
> >> On 08/13/2018 07:52 PM, panoramix.druida wrote:
> >>> Hi, is there a way to measure the level of anonymity on a system?
> >> Sure. There's some literature. Check out
> >> https://www.freehaven.net/papers.html.
> > Thanks, lots of good stuff!!!
> Yeah, it's a _great_ resource.
> >>> Ricochet is way better to protect anonymity. I don’t need a phone
> number, not even a name, I just use the onion service hostname. With
> Richochet I am anonymous all the time unless I identify myself.
> >>> Email may not be as good as Signal for end to end encryption (even
> with pgp), but it can be way better for anonymity. For instance, this email
> account was created using Tor in Protonmail, and there are other mail
> providers that allow me to this. If I always use Protonmail with Tor, it is
> very hard for Protonmail to learn who am I and where I live, doing that
> with Signal is harder. However with Ricochet is way easier.
> >> Well, there's a huge metadata issue with email. Using .onion webmail
> >> mitigates much of it. But everyone needs to watch their OPSEC, to avoid
> >> deanonymization.
> >> And why do you say that deanonymization is way easier with Ricochet?
> >> It's all via .onion instances. But I gather that Tor Project no longer
> >> actively supports the work.
> > What I meant is that is easier to stay anonyumouse on a system like
> OK, got it.
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
More information about the tor-talk