[tor-talk] [OFF-LIST] Re: Has anyone HEARD from IOError since his last tweet?

[notfriendly at riseup.net]

On 2016-06-05 19:50, Anthony Papillion wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> On 6/5/2016 6:47 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 06/05/2016 05:36 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>>> On 6/5/2016 6:30 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>>>> On 06/05/2016 05:14 PM, Anthony Papillion wrote:
>>>>> On 6/5/2016 5:43 PM, notfriendly at riseup.net wrote:
>>>>>> On 2016-06-05 18:17, Anthony Papillion wrote: The last
>>>>>> time IOError tweeted was on 30 May. Has anyone on this list
>>>>>> actually HEARD from him since then? We have to remember
>>>>>> that Jake comes from a really fucked up childhood.
>>>>>> Something like these allegations could push someone over
>>>>>> the edge.
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Anthony
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> He might need time to himself for now. He has a lot of
>>>>>> people talking about him right now. He probably needs a
>>>>>> break.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You're probably right. I've just seen this kind of thing get
>>>>> out of hand before and, innocent or not, people can be pushed
>>>>> over the edge.
>>> 
>>>> I get where you're coming from, but public comments about his
>>>> history, and speculation about suicide, really aren't
>>>> appropriate. IMHO, anyway.
>>> 
>>>> Just sayin'.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Showing concern is completely appropriate. And why not discuss
>>> his history? It's not like he hides it or even tries to. He's
>>> very open about it. I'm not saying anything Jake hasn't publicly
>>> said himself, usually in front of a few hundred people. Sorry,
>>> concern for a fellow human being trumps 'appropriateness' IMO.
>> 
>> I'm fine with concern. But on a mail list, it's creepy. But then,
>> I don't know him. And I'm pretty old-school about privacy.
> 
> Yes, I can agree it's kind of creepy. The only reason I sent it down
> the list was because I don't know specific people who know him that I
> could email privately. Otherwise, I definitely would have preferred
> that. But, surprisingly, I'm pretty OK with being creepy lol
> 
>> I did, however, screw up by sending my own "[OFF-LIST]" message to
>> the list ;)
> 
> That threw me for a second! I saw the off-list designation and then
> thought 'oh crap, I just violated his privacy by responding to a
> private email on the list'. THen I saw it had been sent to the list. I
> should have paid more attention as well and readdressed it. Sorry
> about that!
> 
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXVLqrAAoJEAKK33RTsEsVhCwQAK9azFiK6fluTTPW0pppDxAl
> g+NtoThYMeZbKpogHHa5/fkZEH/IxbWCowadLvik+cjP+X+cig2fz6yjQug8yaxc
> 1SyEXVcAhcqBpj5sVI/CZ9SP80akQD4cEMeYLvqQ0i9SoGDLIofoE9bNOFzka5S8
> 43XEMDU5CoI32hahuA+B7upae4Ka1yOiKoPUj2bKfScQ/PNqnTIHKsD/yWW4v1Zj
> GXfwiGx7M3m2SFLF3Hy74Xnpcl2QwLjzx0BmLzeVleliouO/xtyclvjpPHNXfu2b
> Z5WsXy8Q2yR+4HqlQDVV8jCKcGP3uTn4aNXiqtu1AqVH1qBhcyVelCS/lmZChQ/N
> NK2K3GR91c7/XY1Z1/WuK5pyr46d/x7+HhgRe59PpNM1GyL6Dm4tyj/BvPGfLQIM
> P+jAAOskmL8MNJKqGjGzfSqyw9I+0oDBW+NSpbNxP2btS2R1WMvtQ7L0OTEkKRf8
> 7tvu+C1S/k/S8j/67Dqyls5Q+dlmzTrHhoFjJfm714I1oXekKoWHVuHyEMdr3znK
> cq7Ir9Sl7iQprgoRah3eKEi2aUY8lZ+LRYvbOH7EFmC+FeY9I48I6n0nbhDRLWEy
> AklvQFeZWVVxNJF1UF/fthMTuxjOF5wUQ0vADN2/wNb+6EbgaKE4XpHzz+Jaf7cH
> h+mWNYiccmj68Vwdhpep
> =agD7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

It's fine. If it wasn't for the fact emails are publicly archived then 
the fact that I delete emails immediately after responding to them would 
be enough to protect his privacy.