[tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military

[Cari Machet]

controlled opposition is why i skreech about tor - that it is looked to as
THE SOLUTION ... they know what people are using - not as bad as controlled
demolition but...

would be more effective if people were working on different projects for
security .... as many as possible
On Jul 29, 2015 11:57 PM, "Alexandre Guillioud" <
guillioud.alexandre at gmail.com> wrote:

> I would risk a dumb question : how can it be 'controlled opposition" when
> their (NSA) capacities to listen to whoever they want on tor havn't been
> demonstrated nor refuted ?
>
> Le mercredi 29 juillet 2015, Juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> > On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 +0000
> > Virgil Griffith <i at virgil.gr <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > >>      Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
> > >>      ntending to use Tor for?
> >
> > me:
> > >
> > >
> > > Exactly the same things they use it for right now.
> > >
> > >       Communications for their murdering operations, spying,
> > >       propaganda.
> > >
> > >       Spread of american fascism.
> >
> >
> >         addendum : a Pretty Good Name (PGN) and description for tor is
> >         'controlled opposition'.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk at lists.torproject.org <javascript:;>
> > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> >
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>