[tor-talk] Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
Alexandre Guillioud
guillioud.alexandre at gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 20:56:33 UTC 2015
I would risk a dumb question : how can it be 'controlled opposition" when
their (NSA) capacities to listen to whoever they want on tor havn't been
demonstrated nor refuted ?
Le mercredi 29 juillet 2015, Juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:32:56 +0000
> Virgil Griffith <i at virgil.gr <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> Historically speaking, what was the U.S. navy /military
> >> ntending to use Tor for?
>
> me:
> >
> >
> > Exactly the same things they use it for right now.
> >
> > Communications for their murdering operations, spying,
> > propaganda.
> >
> > Spread of american fascism.
>
>
> addendum : a Pretty Good Name (PGN) and description for tor is
> 'controlled opposition'.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk at lists.torproject.org <javascript:;>
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list