[tor-talk] OnionBalance Hidden Service has over 1 million successful hits in just 3 days

[Thomas White]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Just to expand on s7r's number, I just pulled the latest logs from the
servers and compiled a quick breakdown of the HTTP codes, bandwidth
etc for anyone interested:

HTTP Code: 200 (OK)
Bandwidth used (bytes): 690,400,220,422
Hits: 4,784,288


HTTP Code: 206 (Partial Content)
Bandwidth used (bytes): 5,202,918
Hits: 64


HTTP Code: 304 (Not Modified)
Bandwidth used (bytes): 52,059
Hits: 259


HTTP Code: 404 (Not Found)
Bandwidth used (bytes): 266,053
Hits: 611


HTTP Code: 403 (Forbidden)
Bandwidth used (bytes): 2,908
Hits: 7


HTTP Code: 408 (Request Timeout)
Bandwidth used (bytes): 0
Hits: 5,442


Total bandwidth usage (bytes): 690,405,744,360 (690 GB)

Total hits: 4,790,671


Not bad for a few days work guys!

T




On 08/07/2015 03:00, s7r wrote:
> *Numbers look good: Over 4 million hits in 7 days.*
> 
> I want again to use this opportunity to say THANK YOU to everyone
> who is contributing and stress testing. 4 million requests tell me
> people are putting quite some effort into it. Please continue to
> stress test as much as you can in the next days. After I collect
> some rendezvous circuit stats also, we will stop the test - don't
> want to overkill the network, prefer to leave more bandwidth
> capacity for users.
> 
> I was waiting to have some rendezvous circuit statistics as well,
> to compare them with the hits on the webserver and have an overview
> on the circuits stats and average number of requests per circuit. 
> Hopefully this will happen in the next days. Since you asked, here
> are the exact numbers now.
> 
> The service was started 1st July 2015. Here are the counts today,
> 8th July (little over 7 days of uptime):
> 
> Failback instance #1: 956281 Failback instance #2: 732187 Failback
> instance #3: 837818 Failback instance #4: 768636 Failback instance
> #5: 911546 ============================= TOTAL: 4206468
> 
> There are no significant warnings or errors - the same instances
> are running since service first started, no reboot or application
> restart. I am happy with how it works. As you can see we have *over
> 4 million hits*. The number of requests per failback instance
> confirms the load is fairly spread.
> 
> Hidden service http://eujuuws2nacz4xw4.onion/ up and strong!
> 
> On 7/8/2015 1:48 AM, tqr2813d376cjozqap1l at tutanota.com wrote:
>> 4. Jul 2015 22:57 by s7r at sky-ip.org <mailto:s7r at sky-ip.org>:
> 
>> After little over 3 days of uptime, the OnionBalance hidden 
>> service http://eujuuws2nacz4xw4.onion 
>> <http://eujuuws2nacz4xw4.onion/> was successfully accessed over 1
>>  Million times. There was no complaint in any of the running Tor 
>> instance s.
> 
> 
> 
>> Hey s7r, things still looking OK? How are the numbers now?
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=ZU6g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----