[tor-talk] Torbirdy
Philipp Defner
mail at notmyhostna.me
Tue Jan 27 09:31:44 UTC 2015
>> In short, TorBirdy is the shit!
> Why torbirdy is shit?
There’s a difference [1], he’s saying it’s great and you should be fine using it.
[1] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=the+shit
On 27 Jan 2015, at 09:01, Formidable <formidable at riseup.net> wrote:
> Why torbirdy is shit?
> Only because it leave in header system's timezone?
>
> spencerone at openmailbox.org:
>> Cypher cypher at cpunk.us:
>>>> A few months ago, I seem to remember the general advice being not to
>>>> use Torbirdy. But I see the software was updated only a few months ago
>>>> so I assume it's in active development. Can I assume Torbirdy is safe
>>>> to use?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Cypher
>>>>
>> Jacob Appelbaum jacob at appelbaum.net:
>>> Using TorBirdy is fine - the two time leaks are very small issues
>>> compared to using Thunderbird without TorBirdy. This is especially so
>>> for weak crypto, or a total lack of crypto, which may be possible
>>> without TorBirdy.
>>>
>>> It isn't perfect but it is a whole lot better than plain old
>>> SMTP/POP/IMAP, HTML email, etc, etc.
>>>
>>> Remember we're comparing Thunderbird without TorBirdy vs with
>>> TorBirdy: it is strictly better, even if imperfect.
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>> Jacob
>>
>> In short, TorBirdy is the shit!
>>
>> Wordlife,
>> SpencerOne
>>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 841 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20150127/cd280919/attachment.sig>
More information about the tor-talk
mailing list