[tor-talk] "Hidden Services" vs "Onion services"
boklm at mars-attacks.org
Sun Nov 16 01:05:15 UTC 2014
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> If an expensive marketing company were trying to come up with a term to
> describe more anonymous networks such as .onion, even though "dark net"
> certainly fits, they would probably discourage it because of the reasons
> previously mentioned.
> I don't like "deep web", and I think we can do better than "dark net". I'll
> accept whatever the TOR leadership tells me to use. Perhaps something with
> more neutral connotations, something less "veiled net", "incog net" / "
> icognet", or "shielded net".
I think most of the time, it doesn't really make sense to talk about all
the .onion sites as a whole, so I'm not sure that a term is needed to
describe that. There isn't really a network of all those sites, but many
unrelated sites that just happen to be using the same tool (the Tor network)
and have nothing else in common.
More information about the tor-talk