[tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router

[hellekin]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 11/11/2014 10:47 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:39:06 +0000, hellekin wrote:
> ...
>> But now I think it would be better to explain why it's not necessary,
> 
> You need it if you want to guard against the user device accidentally
> routing around the box?
>
*** That might actually be a feature.  At least during development ;o)

> Also, auto-config of the clients without hassling
> with the upstream DHCP.
>
*** That is a compelling argument.  Zero configuration.

> 
> No need for a switch for a single user device.
> 
> I'm not even completely comfortable with having only one port
> on my router and accessing the DSL modem via VLAN and the switch.
>
*** I am not aware of any (free) hardware that provides a more complex
setup...  If the argument was made properly, maybe Olimex would consider
it...

Thank you for your insight,

==
hk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Phia
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----