[tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
hellekin at gnu.org
Tue Nov 4 18:15:40 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 11/03/2014 04:06 PM, l.m wrote:
> So I can laugh at you when your buyers realize how
> stupid they were for not reading the Tor manual.
> Who the hell
> wants anonymity and actually trusts their networking equipment?
*** Everybody who didn't peruse the anonlib, and/or buy hardware
off-the-shelf. That's a lot of people.
This attitude of disdain of yours is prejudicial to the countless people
who need some privacy and cannot have it because they have no clue how
to do it themselves, and they were thrown into a technological world
where engineers didn't bother building privacy-friendly technology.
If you are among the people who can trust their networking equipment
because you built it, configured it, tested it, and eventually can
change it whenever you feel like you should, then obviously, the Cloak,
or any box aimed at non-technicians is simply not for you.
So yes, you're part of the technical elite, and then what? Does that
mean other people can't enjoy the benefit of their Constitutional Rights
at all, because engineers failed to encode them in the technology that's
sold all over the world?
If a router can provide a minimum of privacy, why wouldn't people go for
it? Obviously, the Anonabox demonstrated that there's a lot of demand
for online privacy, and no matching skills from the buying side.
Going from zero protection to something is better than nothing at all.
As far as anonymity is concerned, there's no technical solution to it.
One has to work hard and tight to preserve their anonymity. So probably
the Cloak shouldn't claim anonymity, but keep their claims in check with
reality, and be happy with privacy. Or rather, provide a more explicit
threat model, where the term "anonymity" is contextualized and the model
is understandable by non-technicians.
I see no reason to spit on initiatives that try to bring solutions, even
if the solutions are not to your taste. When there are false claims and
an obvious will to deceit, be my guest and kick ass. But not everyone
has your skills nor your understanding of limitations, and civil
conversation can help a lot more people to learn from your wisdom than
any argument of authority.
And if you cannot trust your FREE HARDWARE network equipment, you have
an impossible problem to solve, and have to make your own. So, dear
l.m, let me guess: you use off-the-shelf hardware most of the time. how
do you know there's no backdoor in it? Even if you do, how many people
do you think can achieve that kind of scrutiny?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the tor-talk