[tor-talk] Liability to Prosecution for Operating Tor Nodes in Austria
joebtfsplk at gmx.com
Tue Jul 1 23:49:31 UTC 2014
On 7/1/2014 6:35 PM, flapflap wrote:
> FYI (both only in German):
> (via https://blog.fefe.de/?ts=ad4dd623)
> (I'm not familiar with the language of law, just try to summarize it to
> inform you; maybe someone else could translate it more accurately...)
> A court in Austria ruled that one can be held liable to prosecution for
> operating a Tor Exit [but likely also Middle] Node, when it is used by
> someone to commit a criminal action.
> The judge justifies the decision by §12 of the penal code:
> "Not only the direct perpetrator commits a criminal action, but also
> everyone who appoints someone else to commit it or otherwise adds to its
> what a sad and poor decision :(
> To cite (and roughly translate) Fefe:
> "As a precaution, Austrians should stop operating communication
> infrastructure like Jabber, email, and web servers with comment or
> upload functionality, or telephones and fax machines. If I [Fefe] were
> the post, I [Fefe] would stop operations, too."
Wouldn't that mean that any mainstream ISP would also be liable for one
of their customers committing a crime while using their service?
Or GM is liable if a driver of a GM car gets drunk & injures someone?
More information about the tor-talk