[tor-talk] Is there a representative of the LizardSquad on this list?
barberb at barberb.com
Sat Dec 27 17:30:29 UTC 2014
'blackmailing' and 'terrorists' is exactly the hyperbolic and vague
language like 'harassment'. When you staff your project with unethical
assholes, don't be surprised when alot of people act like dicks to you.
2015, the year calls to "fix your shit" became terrorism, blackmail, and
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 10:24 PM, hellekin <hellekin at gnu.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> On 12/27/2014 03:06 AM, benjamin barber wrote:
> > I don't represent the lizards, but when legitimate concerns are
> > away, perhaps it should be shown the the emperor has no clothes.
> *** I don't represent the Tor project, and I agree that legitimate
> concerns should be addressed... But if you were a bit more explicit on
> what concerns were waved away, maybe resolution would be possible.
> > a less trivial and noticeable attack is possible.
> > Unless there is some significant staff
> > changes in the future, I'm with the lizardsquad in exposing tor.
> *** If you're for blackmailing Tor, you should at least be explicit
> about your demands ("significant staff changes"?) and conscious about
> what you're doing. I've read that the Lizard Squad are "ethical
> terrorists". I don't think ethical goes well with blackmailing.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
More information about the tor-talk