[tor-talk] DNS provider that does not hijack failures

[Ted Smith]

On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 21:02 +0200, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Fri, 31 May 2013 11:32:27 +0000, Ted Smith wrote:
> ...
> > 30 second brainstorm of reasons why Google would run a public DNS:
> > 
> >       * Reduce load times/increase positive UX on Google services
> 
> Esp. by including useful additional reponses.
> 
> ...
> > Only highly technical users will ever change their DNS server settings,
> > so Google can't expect much out of this.
> 
> And it's the only open DNS server whose IP address I can remember.

4.2.2.1 is Level 3's. 

-- 
Sent from Ubuntu
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20130531/b52f8143/attachment.pgp>