[tor-talk] Tor's reputation problem with pedo, some easy steps the community could take

David Vorick david.vorick at gmail.com
Fri May 17 17:50:41 UTC 2013


Except I think that in this case Tor is a bit more like a gun than a screw
driver. The good purposes aren't always obvious and the nefarious purposes
are on the forefront of public attention a lot more. It's not a perfect
analogy but I think you see what I'm getting at.

The purpose of Tor is to liberate people from state control and censorship.
Informally, the purpose of Tor is to help people break rules. We support
Tor because we want oppressive rules to be broken but ultimately it's an
anarchist tool, and that's something that's not going to sit well with the
public.


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:22 PM, Gregory Disney
<gregory.disney at owasp.org>wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tor is research first and
> foremost towards anonymity online via software and hardware development. It
> is a tool like any other a screwdriver could be used to build something or
> be turned into a shiv. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13
> (GNU/Linux)
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRllkzAAoJEHJ6fv5JwWqhpaYIAKWVGiYQBnmJf4FkqqrW6QMR
> 3TANo3ZKj0M5h7UgIjclOzhI8/Ffn8t5007mNRzac+8Lforj9G5cpyGJKu8kqfv/
> 3FrBzYq5RRzrN6jqAUZCpIDt0j3SZFK1Bhm19+M+pGIVkzArk8HAyUCA+9rNzMXB
> 2L5jBxI0prUWNykJmjkdIWDosFqDJptDsBzKwij+dft/oJiCVJ2s3t2HxNdLrVMw
> h2tTlWsQxQH/OXan+K54Dn/oCL4wxPD+m58xPv9FGLPQEKR6kJsuH+lvxNhLGa+n
> Yxa0fEVZNUqT9K9muOvRDJXgcTxMtJ91B9XG83l5gXPsvg4zFvvSjcJxRJh8s2w= =QGbl
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Low-Key² <cryptic303 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > The New Yorker just helped out for some positive PR surrounding hidden
> > services.  Last Monday, they implemented "strongbox."  It's a means of
> > sending the New Yorker tips and information without fear of reprisal,
> since
> > not even the New Yorker can know who someone is as a result of IP address
> > logs. The fundamental tech driving that at the core is Tor's hidden
> > services.
> >
> > Sorry to resurrect an old discussion.  But, this thread came to mind as I
> > was reading about Strongbox this week.  With a main stream publication
> like
> > the New Yorker using Tor's hidden services in order to result in public
> > good, this is a very good piece of PR for Tor that should be emphasized.
> > Here are some links.
> >
> >
> >
> http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2013/05/introducing-strongbox-anonymous-document-sharing-tool.html
> > http://www.newyorker.com/strongbox/
> > http://deaddrop.github.io/
> >
> > http://mashable.com/2013/05/15/new-yorker-strongbox/
> >
> >
> http://www.forbes.com/sites/andygreenberg/2013/05/15/opening-the-lid-on-strongbox-the-new-yorker-anonymous-dropbox-coded-by-aaron-swartz/
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Roger Dingledine <arma at mit.edu>
> > To: tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 3:06 PM
> > Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor's reputation problem with pedo,
> >  some easy steps the community could take
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 01:32:59PM -0400, Chris Patti wrote:
> > > As a newcomer to Tor, as I explored the various onions out there, I
> felt
> > as
> > > if practically everywhere I turned there were links taking me to pedo
> > > sites, IRC channels etc.
> >
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> > I agree with you. Part of what we have done a poor job communicating
> > is that hidden services are a tiny fraction of overall Tor use. The
> > wikipedia article on Tor is mostly written by hidden service enthusiasts
> > (as far as I can tell), which further misleads people.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > tor-talk mailing list
> > tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> >
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>


More information about the tor-talk mailing list