[tor-talk] Request for "Tor, king of anonymity" graphic

nano nanotek at bsdbox.co
Fri Dec 27 00:19:18 UTC 2013


On 26/12/2013 11:15 PM, Lee wrote:
> On 12/26/13, nano <nanotek at bsdbox.co> wrote:
>> On 26/12/2013 8:51 PM, Lee wrote:
>>> On 12/25/13, nano <nanotek at bsdbox.co> wrote:
>>>> On 26/12/2013 7:46 AM, Mirimir wrote:
>>>>> On 12/25/2013 02:59 AM, nano wrote:
>>>>>> On 25/12/2013 8:11 PM, Lunar wrote:
>>>>>>> nanotek:
>>>>>>>> I really didn't get the "rape" vibe from the graphic at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you describe what is in the graphic?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Could you try to summarize its intended meaning?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure. I shared my favoured interpretation earlier.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Beyond that, I see Jefferson fucking Obama from behind (i.e. bucking
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> ignominious attempts to erode our hard-earned constitutional
>>>>>> convention). It is very well done too. Picture perfect!
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't it the NSA that's been doing most of the backdoor fucking?
>>>>
>>>> Indeed. The irony only adds to its appeal.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Tor is rather more like a chastity belt than a crown ;)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Tor empowers citizens to royally fuck Orwellian tactical planning, such
>>>> as that which is implemented by the NSA.
>>>
>>> You should take another look at the docs - eg:
>>> https://svn.torproject.org/svn/torvm/trunk/doc/design.html
>>>
>>>      Indefensible Attacks
>>>         Tor Attacks
>>>           Attacks which Tor cannot defend against, like a global passive
>>> adversary or traffic confirmation attacks, are obviously outside the
>>> scope of even the most robust Tor implementation.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Lee
>>>
>>
>> There is no need. It has been read many times.
>>
>> Not sure how your suggestion diminishes Tor's utility in circumventing
>> Orwellian policies.
>
> I'm just pointing out that the NSA is a global passive adversary.  My
> guess is that Tor's ability to royally fuck Orwellian tactical
> planning by the NSA is minimal, but it's possible we have different
> definitions of "royally fuck" :)
>
> Lee
>

No doubt :)

My statement was in reference to the original topic of the graphic and 
its (perceived) intended meaning.

-- 
syn.bsdbox.co


More information about the tor-talk mailing list