[tor-talk] Hiding stuff

[antispam06 at sent.at]

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012, at 13:14, proper wrote:
> Must be a "quite modern" system. Sorry, I can't go into detail, I
> haven't made a comprehensive benchmark with various machines.
> 
> If hardware supports virtualization, i.e. the CPU features AMD-V or
> VT-x, it works much better.

So it's for the big boys. But it's not the developers' fault. It should
be a black eye for the protocol guys who designed only wide open
standards and white papers with no regard to privacy. Otherwise, a heavy
encrypted standard common for communication would have meant tablets
would have been powerful enough or they wouldn't sell.

> > Isn't Ubuntu a little bit too large, at least for the Gateway?
> 
> No.
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorBOX/FAQ#WhyaretheTorBOXimagessobig

Right. Signed packages and large userbase should trump the rest. Now,
all I have to do is convince Ubuntu to head towards Puppy Linux and not
MacOS XII. Just kidding.