[tor-talk] Tor 0.2.2.29-beta is out

[Matthew]

  Tor -v shows I am using 0.2.1.30 on Ubuntu 10.04.

I have deb http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org lucid main in 
/etc/apt/sources.list as recommended by 
https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian.html.en

I have run apt-get update and apt-get update but I am still running 0.2.1.30.

I am wondering why this is the case unless 0.2.2.29 and other 0.2.2.x 
versions do not apply to Ubuntu.

Thanks.



On 21/06/11 07:38, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Tor 0.2.2.29-beta reverts an accidental behavior change for users who
> have bridge lines in their torrc but don't want to use them; gets
> us closer to having the control socket feature working on Debian;
> and fixes a variety of smaller bugs.
>
> Packages will appear on the download page in the coming days.
>
> (We didn't make packages for the previous beta release, because we didn't
> want to harm users who would be bitten by bug 3354.)
>
> Changes in version 0.2.2.29-beta - 2011-06-20
>    o Major bugfixes:
>      - Revert the UseBridges option to its behavior before 0.2.2.28-beta.
>        When we changed the default behavior to "use bridges if any
>        are listed in the torrc", we surprised users who had bridges
>        in their torrc files but who didn't actually want to use them.
>        Partial resolution for bug 3354.
>
>    o Privacy fixes:
>      - Don't attach new streams to old rendezvous circuits after SIGNAL
>        NEWNYM. Previously, we would keep using an existing rendezvous
>        circuit if it remained open (i.e. if it were kept open by a
>        long-lived stream, or if a new stream were attached to it before
>        Tor could notice that it was old and no longer in use). Bugfix on
>        0.1.1.15-rc; fixes bug 3375.
>
>    o Minor bugfixes:
>      - Fix a bug when using ControlSocketsGroupWritable with User. The
>        directory's group would be checked against the current group, not
>        the configured group. Patch by Jérémy Bobbio. Fixes bug 3393;
>        bugfix on 0.2.2.26-beta.
>      - Make connection_printf_to_buf()'s behaviour sane. Its callers
>        expect it to emit a CRLF iff the format string ends with CRLF;
>        it actually emitted a CRLF iff (a) the format string ended with
>        CRLF or (b) the resulting string was over 1023 characters long or
>        (c) the format string did not end with CRLF *and* the resulting
>        string was 1021 characters long or longer. Bugfix on 0.1.1.9-alpha;
>        fixes part of bug 3407.
>      - Make send_control_event_impl()'s behaviour sane. Its callers
>        expect it to always emit a CRLF at the end of the string; it
>        might have emitted extra control characters as well. Bugfix on
>        0.1.1.9-alpha; fixes another part of bug 3407.
>      - Make crypto_rand_int() check the value of its input correctly.
>        Previously, it accepted values up to UINT_MAX, but could return a
>        negative number if given a value above INT_MAX+1. Found by George
>        Kadianakis. Fixes bug 3306; bugfix on 0.2.2pre14.
>      - Avoid a segfault when reading a malformed circuit build state
>        with more than INT_MAX entries. Found by wanoskarnet. Bugfix on
>        0.2.2.4-alpha.
>      - When asked about a DNS record type we don't support via a
>        client DNSPort, reply with NOTIMPL rather than an empty
>        reply. Patch by intrigeri. Fixes bug 3369; bugfix on 2.0.1-alpha.
>      - Fix a rare memory leak during stats writing. Found by coverity.
>
>    o Minor features:
>      - Update to the June 1 2011 Maxmind GeoLite Country database.
>
>    o Code simplifications and refactoring:
>      - Remove some dead code as indicated by coverity.
>      - Remove a few dead assignments during router parsing. Found by
>        coverity.
>      - Add some forgotten return value checks during unit tests. Found
>        by coverity.
>      - Don't use 1-bit wide signed bit fields. Found by coverity.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20110621/a48231af/attachment-0001.htm>