Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?

[Julie C]

I suppose the anarchist genes in me are not strong enough. I have to agree
with Mike Perry's arguments, given his credibility, and his clearer
perspective than most of the rest of us. If this BadExit policy is being
made up ad-hoc, that's fine by me. If the offending Tor node operators want
to stand up and defend themselves, or their choices, that's fine too.

--
Julie C.
julie at h-ck.ca
GPG key FF4E2E70 available at http://keys.gnupg.net




On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:44 AM, John Case <case at sdf.lonestar.org> wrote:

>
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, morphium wrote:
>
>  Sure, dude. Since you've read everything that was said, I take it
>>> you're volunteering to contact the other node operators and ask them
>>> to give reasons for why they chose their exit policy?
>>>
>>
>> So please BadExit all nodes without contact email, if they don't
>> explain why they chose the default exit policy, I think they should be
>> blacklisted!
>>
>
>
> No, it goes further than that.  The real motion here is to BadExit all
> nodes that aren't being used and deployed exactly like "I" deploy mine.
>
> When the dust settles, could we get the official threat model, and the
> official end user profile and the official use case documented ?  Again, for
> the lulz.
>
> ***********************************************************************
> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo at torproject.org with
> unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20110214/6796a4a7/attachment.htm>