Is "gatereloaded" a Bad Exit?

[Ted Smith]

On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 14:41 +0100, morphium wrote:
> So, with everything said, could we now please Un-BadExit the nodes
> that were affected?
> 

Sorry, but this has been a long thread and I want to try to make sure I
understand something important.

Is it true or false that traffic was actually exiting through
gatereloaded et all?

I recall seeing that those nodes weren't marked as exits in the
consensus anyway. If that is the case, then all of John Case's arguments
related to super-secret movie-plot usages of Tor and servers running on
port 80 only accessible through gatereloaded et all seem to be
irrelevant.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20110214/3eb7dfa4/attachment.pgp>