[tor-talk] Automatic vulnerability scanning of Tor Network?

[stars]

Le Tue, 27 Dec 2011 09:06:34 -0600,
Jon <torance.ca at gmail.com> a écrit :

> On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Sebastian Hahn
> <mail at sebastianhahn.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Dec 27, 2011, at 7:03 AM, John Case wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, Lee wrote:
> >>
> >>>> While I totally get both sides of this argument *in theory*, all
> >>>> of this sounds a lot to me like getting pissed off about someone
> >>>> ringing your doorbell because they didn't mail you an opt-in
> >>>> form first.
> >>>
> >>> Nope.  The probes were annoying, but the killer was my all-in-one
> >>> consumer grade router/nat/dhcp server/firewall leaking packets
> >>> into what was supposed to be the secure part of my home network.
> >>
> >>
> >> Ahhh, finally.
> >>
> >> This is the Godwins law of tor-talk - all threads eventually lead
> >> to some moron running a relay from their home Internet connection.
> >>
> >> To be fair, if we let the thread run long enough, I'll bet Mr.
> >> Do-Gooder-Port-Scanner is running from home, too.  Comedy from all
> >> directions.
> >
> > I feel that your insults are entirely uncalled for here. Running a
> > relay from a home connection is perfectly fine if there's enough
> > spare bandwidth. There is absolutely nothing wrong with doing just
> > that, and I am thankful to every operator who sets up a good node.
> 
> I am going to have to agree with Sebastian here. I think that there
> are more relays running from home then people realize. No, they
> probably are not running in the high end as some of those relays that
> are able to have company or some other type of backing. But they are
> relays just the same and are part of the Tor network and are depended
> on just like any of the others.
> 
> To pay out of ones pocket for the bandwidth for a dedicated Tor relay
> is not cheap. So kudo's to those that are able to run their dedicated
> relays from home on their own expense. Adding that it is not said
> enough, if it were not for the  individual relays from home, I don't
> believe that there would be as many relay nodes as we have now.
> 
> Thank you all out there that are able to, for donating your time,
> money, equipment, etc., in running relays from your home. The more the
> merrier...
> 
> Jon
> _______________________________________________
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk at lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

I agree too with Sebastian, i was running a Exit Relay at home a couple
years before i got some problems with autority but i has stoped to be
exit and only a "non-exit" relay and from that i never had new
problems.... I have 100 Mbits with no limit with the Traffic and it
will be sad to not givin my bandwitch capacity for the network.. So
ican offer a clean and great relay for Tor :-)  

Best Regards 

SwissTorHelp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20111227/fa1bcc01/attachment.pgp>