Ubuntu Privacy Remix 10.04r1 out

[Ted Smith]

On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 03:54 -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake Eugen Leitl (eugen at leitl.org):
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 02:44:59PM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
> > > Thus spake Eugen Leitl (eugen at leitl.org):
> > > 
> > > > https://www.privacy-cd.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=66&Itemid=89
> > > 
> > > https://www.privacy-cd.org/en/no-network
> > > 
> > > I suppose that's one way to address the problem of the network
> > > adversary... Sure looks like this means this post has nothing to do
> > > with Tor, though.
> > 
> > Yes, it doesn't have to do with Tor directly, should have
> > pointed that out. However, there's at least some overlap
> > between Tor users and higher paranoia-level folks, and the 
> > environment is complementary to Tor in that regard.
> 
> There may be some overlap, but all of those people are doing it wrong.
> 

You can't really say that they're doing it wrong. They're just doing it
right to the point of not really doing much of anything. Security is all
about a balance of doing it wrong versus doing it right in a way that
allows you to do stuff. Apparently, UPR's users can do stuff, or at
least I assume they can if they use UPR.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20101018/25237673/attachment.pgp>