Full bandwidth is not used.

[Paul Menzel]

Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 07:40 -0500 schrieb andrew at torproject.org:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:21:29AM +0100, paulepanter at users.sourceforge.net wrote 1.6K bytes in 52 lines about:
> : I now increased the RAM too and restarted the server to no avail. It is
> : still below 100 KB/s.
> 
> What is the network configuration?

        $ more /etc/tor/torrc
        SocksPort 0 # what port to open for local application
        connections
        ControlPort 9051
        ORPort 443
        ORListenAddress 0.0.0.0:9090
        Address 62.141.42.186
        ContactInfo 1024D/6C0E1D58 Paul Menzel <paul at gw90.de>
        DirPort 80 # what port to advertise for directory connections
        DirListenAddress 0.0.0.0:9091

It is a virtual machine and connections to port 80 and 443 are forwarded
by an IPtables entry in the nat table with DNAT to the virtual host. On
the virtual host using IPtables ports 80 and 443 are forwarded to 9090
and 9091.

Sebastian on IRC helped me to gather more data. In `cached-descriptors`
I have the following.

        bandwidth 5242880 10485760 155910

There are more entries for my IP address when I restarted and upgraded
Tor.

In `cached-consensus` (from 12:28 UTC) there is

        r anonymisierungsdien s+wb9df31yS6Y02Rvl0i0tenAWA vyRDgH2XTP6Tn1MPiJkWE0Yk9e8 2010-03-08 18:05:07 62.141.42.186 443 80
        s Exit Fast HSDir Running Stable V2Dir Valid
        v Tor 0.2.1.23
        w Bandwidth=61
        p reject 25,119,135-139,445,563,1214,4661-4666,6346-6429,6699,6881-6999

and Bandwidth even decreased by 1 (from 62) compared to the value before
the update (11:14 UTC).

Very strange.


Thanks,

Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20100309/05b4891a/attachment.pgp>