tor-proxy.net

[M]

Also, any reason the TOR website does offer something like this?

On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:39 PM, M <moeedsalam at gmail.com> wrote:

> thanks for the info. I understand that it cant be safer than the real
> stuff, but objectively, i do  believe its safer than other online proxies,
> such as anonymouse? Am i correct?
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 1:39 PM, <andrew at torproject.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 03:52:17AM +0000, moeedsalam at gmail.com wrote 0.8K
>> bytes in 22 lines about:
>> : tor-proxy.net
>> : Is it a good alternative if i am out without my TorBrowser Bundle?
>>
>> To be clear, this service has nothing to do with us as the Tor Project.
>> Years ago we asked
>> for a disclaimer, http://tor-proxy.net/?q=en/node/1#official.  He didn't
>> get the Tor url correct.
>>
>> : Whats the diff between the First option (express)and the third?
>>
>> You should ask him, http://tor-proxy.net/index.php?q=en/node/7.
>>
>> I don't think anyone from Tor has actually met the operator, Ben.  I
>> can't make a value judgement on if this is good or not.  I like the fact
>> there is no client install, just connect and use Tor.  I'm concerned
>> that even if Ben is an upstanding privacy activist and truly logs
>> nothing, the connection to his dedicated server could still be watched
>> and logged by someone else.
>>
>> Perhaps Ben is on or-talk and can explain his experiences and the setup
>> of tor-proxy.net in more detail.
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Lewman
>> The Tor Project
>> pgp 0x31B0974B
>>
>> Website: https://torproject.org/
>> Blog: https://blog.torproject.org/
>> Identi.ca: torproject
>> ***********************************************************************
>> To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo at torproject.org with
>> unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20100101/7ded701d/attachment.htm>