Tor notice

Jim Jimmymac at
Tue Aug 10 04:35:50 UTC 2010

andrew at wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:48:24PM +0200, spacemarc at wrote 0.4K bytes in 9 lines about:
> : why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for
> : strong anonymity"? If not Tor, what should we use for strong
> : anonymity? excluding Freenet and cryptography apps.

> Many other tools simply state they are anonymous, without mentioning any
> of the R&D on current anonymity attacks, their success probabilities,
> and design flaws. If you're interested in learning more about the
> current state of the field of anonymity in research, start here;

Would it make sense to add that link, or some other link, to the message 
   Tor prints out so the casual user can get some idea of what the 
message means?

To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo at with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body.

More information about the tor-talk mailing list