Am I really helping tor

ivvmm unachievable at gmail.com
Sat Jan 17 11:10:24 UTC 2009


Roger Dingledine wrote:
> 
> But that said, you probably won't see much traffic on your ORPort
> either, yet, since you're a bridge. At this point, bridges are a future
> step on the "blocking resistance" arms race:
> https://svn.torproject.org/svn/tor/trunk/doc/design-paper/blocking.html
> and no country has gotten that far on the arms race yet. So they're more
> a strategy that we have in reserve for the time when we need it.
> 
> Hope that helps,
> --Roger
> 
> 

To sum it up, I'd better run a Bridge if really wanna help Tor project?
I am somewhat afraid of government, I realise that's a kind of paranoia
but it seems to be real in my country. So I mentioned only these lines
in torrc to use traffic:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ExitPolicy accept *:80
ExitPolicy accept *:443
ExitPolicy reject *:*
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

So. It is better now to run a relay and a bridge in the long term?

Thanks Roger and Scott, your information helped me.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20090117/695a6915/attachment.pgp>


More information about the tor-talk mailing list