windows tor

[Flamsmark]

Then perhaps complaining about the direction of the work that many others
have done pro bono is a little premature, no?

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 01:18, Peter <necedemalis at gmail.com> wrote:

> Heh, well, I tell you what.  You send me a hundred thousand dollars,
> and after the check clears I'll write you a great windows kernel
> driver.  Otherwise, I'm broke, my life is a living hell, and I already
> have several projects I work on out of the goodness of my heart, so,
> I'm sorry.
>
> Thanks and good luck.
>
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Flamsmark<flamsmark at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Why not just a Windows kernel driver? Because it hasn't been written yet.
> > You're welcome to help write a kernel driver, or a VPN host or whatever
> else
> > you think is the next logical step to improving Tor. However, remember
> the
> > version number: 0.2.1.*. Tor is not a 'finished' piece of software. It is
> > not feature-complete; it does not implement everything that's either
> desired
> > or required for ideal use. However, right now, much of the development
> > effort is not spent making it easier for clients to use. There's a
> feeling
> > that it's currently 'good enough' that those who really need to use Tor
> will
> > be able to follow the instructions and get it working. If you don't agree
> > with that emphasis, again, it's your prerogative to build those feature
> that
> > you think are most important.
> > We all look forward to seeing your contributions!
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20090813/09f50e52/attachment.htm>