windows tor

[Flamsmark]

Why not just a Windows kernel driver? Because it hasn't been written yet.
You're welcome to help write a kernel driver, or a VPN host or whatever else
you think is the next logical step to improving Tor. However, remember the
version number: 0.2.1.*. Tor is not a 'finished' piece of software. It is
not feature-complete; it does not implement everything that's either desired
or required for ideal use. However, right now, much of the development
effort is not spent making it easier for clients to use. There's a feeling
that it's currently 'good enough' that those who really need to use Tor will
be able to follow the instructions and get it working. If you don't agree
with that emphasis, again, it's your prerogative to build those feature that
you think are most important.

We all look forward to seeing your contributions!


On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 00:27, Peter <necedemalis at gmail.com> wrote:

> You're kidding me right.  A VM?  Why not just a windows kernel driver?
>
> >
> > Look at torvm, https://torproject.org/torvm.  It's still alpha-ware, but
> > essentially does just what you want.  You mentioned you were a
> > programmer, join us in improving TorVM.
> >
> > I'd like a pony, too.
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Lewman
> > The Tor Project
> > pgp 0x31B0974B
> >
> > Website: https://torproject.org/
> > Blog: https://blog.torproject.org/
> > Identica/Twitter: torproject
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/attachments/20090813/881c06a6/attachment.htm>